Tiny Bubbles, Big Trouble

By Divers Alert Network

Could we one day have personalized deco algorithms, reducing the DCS risks on an individual basis? Photo: DAN

Decompression sickness( DCS) is a tricky condition. On one hand, we know a lot about who gets it and whenaand even how to prevent it, but we do not have a definitive understanding of the mechanisms of bubble formation or trauma. Decades worth of research have culminated in an understanding that divers bubble and get injured by some bubbles, and we have hypothesis about how the number or size of bubbles affects risk of trauma, but thatas as far as definitive mechanisms go. Thatas not to say that weare in the dark entirely; a combination of research, experience and conservative theoretical simulate please give divers tables that yield extremely low injury rates and the knowledge we require to keep ourselves safe. Understanding exactly what happens from bubble formation to the specific mechanism of trauma and applying it to a useful calculation of DCS risk, however, is a tall order that hasnat proved achievableayet.A

Virginie Papadopoulou, Ph.D ., a researcher at the University of North Carolina, is working on an understanding of bubble mechanics that approaches the gaps in our knowledge both at a molecular level and a holistic one. Her work deals with the clinical applications of bubbles in ultrasound-targeted drug delivery, bubble formation in divers, and correlation of bubble countings with DCS risk. Work from her lab and others various regions of the world with similar expertise has been demonstrated that the current post-dive bubble counts we are presented in divers do not immediately correlate to DCS risk. Recent proposals from Papadopoulou and others have theorized that post-dive bubble countings may be able to correlate to DCS risk if more advanced ultrasound imaging is brought to bear. These researchers theorize that current bubble countings is no longer able provide accurate data because they measure merely bubbles of the size that can be accurately seen using traditional ultrasound technology, but more advanced methods may count significant quantities of highly small bubbles that affect a diveras risk.

( Really) A TinyA Bubbles

The microbubbles Papadopoulou and others are trying to track down are almost incomprehensibly small and havenat been on the radar of ultrasound imaging studies until now. Ranging from 1-10 micrometers in sizing, the smallest of these bubbles is about 1/100 th the diameter of a human hair. Their ability to slip through our bloodstream without detection is the key to their potential effect on DCS risk.A

Previous studies have shown that most divers render some bubbles after a dive, but some render significantly more than others, leading to the idea that some divers are abubblersa and some are not. This difference is at the core of the incompatibilities in DCS risk computations; bubblers and non-bubblers can yield dramatically different bubble count data after identical dives even with external factors accounted for. Papadopoulou and her colleagues theorize that this may be because the non-bubblers are producing smaller bubbles but in similar sums. More advanced imaging techniques are showing some promise in improving our ability to measure bubbles in both types of divers. This research is currently in progress, so we canat yet alter the way we dive because of it. However, it represents a significant change in the way DCS is understood and “couldve been” the next big step forward in preventing the condition. A

CombiningA Models

In addition to looking at new ways to understand the quantity, kind, and formation of bubbles in divers, researchers such as Papadopoulou are working to understand the individual mechanisms of DCS in combination with a holistic approach to the condition. Instead than simply noting which divers had DCS and then modifying dive algorithms, these researchers are working to understand the effects of factors such as hydration, ascending rate, water temperature, exercise, body composition, and moreaand then combining those with the quantitative data( bubble countings, for example) they meet. Considering these risk factors in light of reported DCS symptoms as well as the broader picture of fatigue, aches, and other symptoms frequently rejected as subclinical or caused by other factors related to diving may help us find new ways to understand the risks we face as divers and more accurately calculate our risk.A

Itas impossible to tell if the current research is on the verge of illuminating the ablack boxa that is DCS risk or if weare still decades away, but some impressive results have already come from this sort of research. As a community we can look forward to a field of young researchers interested in the clinical applications of bubble science as well as the improvement of our safety as divers. The end aim will be personalized decompression algorithms tailored to our individual physiologies and dive profiles, but how soon weall ensure these is hard to say. Even without definitive results, however, understanding the research process as it progresses may offer divers with new best practices to minimize their risksaeven before all the secrets of DCS are discovered.A

For more information on safe diving practises visit www.DAN.org

The post Tiny Bubbles, Big Trouble appeared first on DIVER magazine.

Read more:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *